- #Apple image capture vs iphoto full
- #Apple image capture vs iphoto pro
- #Apple image capture vs iphoto software
- #Apple image capture vs iphoto mac
#Apple image capture vs iphoto full
In the interest of full disclosure, I have - or at least had - a horse in this race. One way or the other, it'll take a lot more than what we saw to fill in the blanks to Aperture users' satisfaction. And as it exists now, Aperture and iPhoto's iCloud support seems more grafted on than truly integrated. Photos promises to be a better mainstream photo editing and cataloging tool for iPhoto, but Apple's set the bar low there.
#Apple image capture vs iphoto mac
What we do know is that it has an interface that looks thoroughly optimized for multi-touch gestures on a trackpad or Magic Mouse.įederighi showed off some image retouching functionality in Photos and gave a brief demonstration of navigating within timelines to emphasize its "beautiful, buttery scrolling."įederighi calls Photos "a new grounds-up photo solution for the Mac built with iCloud in mind." And Federighi also demonstrated some impressive retouching capabilities that promise to make it easier to make your photos look better.
#Apple image capture vs iphoto software
Outside of a precious few minutes getting demoed by Apple senior vice president of Software Engineering Craig Federighi on the WWDC keynote stage, very little is known about the new Photos app on the Mac. So far public information about Photos is pretty scant. Photos for the Mac borrows its name and its icon from its iOS counterpart. But will Photos be able to replace both of them? Photosīoth iPhoto and Aperture will be replaced by Photos beginning in 2015. Ultimately iPhoto and Aperture were both hot messes. Stability issues, database corruption problems, not to mention really atrocious performance problems have all be reported and complained about by frequent users. Unfortunately, both Aperture and iPhoto have been prone to a lot of problems over the years. Aperture helps them do that, and helps them make changes to the metadata associated with each picture to help photographers catalog faster too.
#Apple image capture vs iphoto pro
Pro photographers shoot a lot of images and need to make sense of what they've shot. Accordingly, Aperture has a more complete feature set of image adjustments and retouching abilities.Īnother area Aperture really sets itself apart from iPhoto is in its vast organizational abilities. Raw images are supported on iPhoto, but Aperture's entire workflow is based on the assumption you're starting with raw files. Aperture emphasizes non-destructive photo editing that doesn't take up huge amounts of hard disk space, so you can undo what you've done or just subtract specific elements that you don't like (iPhoto has some non-destructive editing capabilities Aperture has a lot more).Īperture also emphasizes work with "raw" digital formats - the data that the camera actually recorded on its imaging chip, not compressed and changed with JPG. Some of the same basic concepts, but greatly enhanced for the needs of professionals. You can crop images, straighten them, remove red-eye, perform one-click enhancements that make adjustments to lighting, color saturation and other attributes, apply effects, and get down into the nitty gritty by adjusting various aspects of the photo like exposure, contrast, saturation, color levels and more.Īperture is to iPhoto what Logic is to GarageBand. And it reads GPS data (when embedded in your photos' metadata), so you can organize photos easily by location.Ī variety of built-in editing tools help iPhoto make your images look better. It incorporates facial recognition, so you can more easily find pictures of family and friends. iPhoto organizes photos by event, for example.
iPhotos is set up to offer you as much organization functionality as possible without your direct intervention. IPhoto comes with the Mac, and it provides a full array of photo editing, cataloging and sharing capabilities right out of the box.
0 kommentar(er)
